On 05/30/2010 04:09 AM, Simen kjaeraas wrote:
Don <[email protected]> wrote:<g>. I just think that @ shouldn't be an excuse to be careless -- anything with an @ in front is still part of the language. That's all.I know, and I agree. It irritates me whenever people say @foo is not a keyword. By that logic, we might as well say any word starting with a 'w' is not a keyword. Would get rid of that pesky 'while'.
Please read my reply to Don. If implemented properly, @foo is *not* a keyword.
