Mon, 31 May 2010 18:23:18 +0200, Pelle wrote: > On 05/31/2010 05:43 PM, retard wrote: >> DMD is much slower than Sun Javac/Jvm 7, GNU GCC 4.5, and LLVM. > > For very special values of much, I suppose.
Polymorphic method calls, auto-vectorization, link-time optimization, floating point performance, etc. > >> For example the lambda syntax is terribly verbose in D compared to >> Scala or Haskell. > > But way better than in java, C, C++ or almost any other language. So basically if I'm offering you $100000 and $10, you're taking $10 because it's more than $1 or $2 or any value between $3 and $4. Great logic. > >> D& DMD are unstable, badly specified, buggy and most dsource projects >> are deprecated (D1) or dead. > > True, but it's not like D isn't moving anywhere in that aspect. Not sure about that. I'm still waiting for proper .stringof documentation and a formal spec for SafeD (I really want to know what it is exactly and what it is not).. > Is there a point in here somewhere? :) I suppose not..
