BCS wrote:
Hello retard,
Mon, 31 May 2010 18:23:18 +0200, Pelle wrote:
On 05/31/2010 05:43 PM, retard wrote:
For example the lambda syntax is terribly verbose in D compared to
Scala or Haskell.
But way better than in java, C, C++ or almost any other language.
So basically if I'm offering you $100000 and $10, you're taking $10
because it's more than $1 or $2 or any value between $3 and $4. Great
logic.
I'd say it's more like me taking $10 over $10.14 because I don't have to
deal with the coins.
D& DMD are unstable, badly specified, buggy and most dsource
projects are deprecated (D1) or dead.
True, but it's not like D isn't moving anywhere in that aspect.
Not sure about that. I'm still waiting for proper .stringof
documentation
I see a lot of fruit that's a lot lower and juicer than that. For that
matter, you can read the source, figure it out your self and write the
docs for it. Heck, even if you just slapped together some notes and
posted them in an bugzilla ticket it would be something.
and a formal spec for SafeD (I really want to know what
it is exactly and what it is not)..
Um, it's easy to figure out of something is or isn't allowed in safeD;
write a program and try it.
That doesn't work. Pointer arithmetic is forbidden in safeD, but
currently accepted by the compiler.
But don't worry about this stuff, it should be fixed fairly soon.
