On 2010-08-13 20:45:13 -0400, dsimcha <dsim...@yahoo.com> said:
http://dsource.org/projects/phobos/changeset/1849
I've added some trivial convenience functions to Phobos that should have been
there a long time ago and should go a long way towards making Rebindable more
usable. The other thing we need is bug fixes in alias this/opDot,
which we need
eventually anyhow. Now, instead of doing something like this ugly, verbose,
specify-things-twice code:
auto foo = Rebindable!(LongTypeName)(new LongTypeName); // Shoot me.
You can do:
auto foo = rebindable(new LongTypeName); // Sanity restored.
Now the question for genericity's sake is: should
Unqual!(const(Object)) give you the type Rebindable!(const(Object))?
Unfortunately, you probably can't get this one right without some help
from the compiler: immutable(Rebindable!(const(Object)))?
And what will Unqual do with this:
Unqual!(immutable(Rebindable!(const(Object)))?
--
Michel Fortin
michel.for...@michelf.com
http://michelf.com/
