Craig Black Wrote: > > One more thing - to clarify, Craig, are you implying that it's acceptable > > for performance to be within 20%? If not, there are tweaks on the > > algorithmic side we can do to improve sorting. > > 20% slower would be acceptable if I didn't have to do my own inlining. > Closing the gap even more would be nice. Twice as slow is not acceptable. > > -Craig
I wish I had your problems. I ported a sizable set of C++ code to D2 and discovered D2 with dmd was 50x slower than C++ with gcc! I've been to busy/disappointed to track down the bug(s) causing such a slowdown. If anyone is sufficiently inspired to find the bugs, I can make the GPL source code available. >
