On 12/12/10 5:06 PM, Simen kjaeraas wrote:
Jason House <[email protected]> wrote:
Craig Black Wrote:
> One more thing - to clarify, Craig, are you implying that it's
acceptable
> for performance to be within 20%? If not, there are tweaks on the
> algorithmic side we can do to improve sorting.
20% slower would be acceptable if I didn't have to do my own inlining.
Closing the gap even more would be nice. Twice as slow is not
acceptable.
-Craig
I wish I had your problems. I ported a sizable set of C++ code to D2
and discovered D2 with dmd was 50x slower than C++ with gcc! I've been
to busy/disappointed to track down the bug(s) causing such a slowdown.
If anyone is sufficiently inspired to find the bugs, I can make the
GPL source code available.
If no-one else has stepped up, I'm willing to have a look.
That would be a great help to the community. I did look at that code and
nothing jumped at me. But then I didn't have enough time to profile it
properly.
Andrei
