On 03/01/11 18:15, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
The typical problem with things that look native but aren't technically
native is that there's almost inevitably things that don't work right. For
instance, they may ignore the system color scheme, they may fail to work
with tools that inspect/manipulate other app's controls, they may not behave
correctly outside of the most common use-cases, they may ignore system-wide
skin settings (such things do, and should, exist for Windows), and I've even
seen ones that actually go and emulate the wrong system style (For instance,
Chrome/Iron's dialog windows look like Aero...but I'm on XP, and if I were
on Win7 I'd be using the Classic theme anyway. Very very sloppy).

If it turns out that Qt's self-drawn controls doesn't have any of those
issues, then I agree there's no problem at all. I'd also be incredibly
impressed.

I've not seen any such issues on Windows/Linux/OS X, could be others though *shrugg*. I'm pretty sure Qt uses the native API as a backend anyway, I remember reading an article about them transitioning from carbon to cocoa on OS X (the native APIs) on their blog at some point, I'd be surprised if they didn't do the same for Windows.

--
Robert
http://octarineparrot.com/

Reply via email to