"Sönke Ludwig" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
news:[email protected]...
> I'm all for this change.
>
> Since there are already similar differences between 1.0 and 2.0 (e.g. 
> invariant()) and projects can be fixed by a more or less simple search and 
> replace, this would be a cheap way to clean up a keyword that can truly 
> get in your way (in contrast to some others that have already been 
> removed).
>
> Actually I think the only keywords that really got in my way were "body" 
> and "function" - I now have modules named body_.d and function_.d

I've had "unittest", "mixin" and "in" get in the way (but not in any way 
that was actualy a real problem, just a minor *minor* inconvenience).



Reply via email to