On 3/25/2011 3:50 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Mar 24, 2011, at 1:00 PM, dsimcha wrote:
BTW, the TempAlloc module also includes a hash table, hash set and AVL tree that
are specifically optimized for TempAlloc. Should these be included in the
submission? The disadvantages I see here is that they are less generally useful
(possibly too high level for druntime) and that they will make the review take a
heck of a lot longer.
Are they necessary for TempAlloc to function? If so, I'd add them but hidden,
as I imagine there's more code than you'd want to simply drop in a private
block in core.memory. It may be time for core to get a core.internal package
for this kind of stuff.
No, they are just data structures built on top of TempAlloc and
optimized for it.