On 31/03/2011 16:11, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:39:29 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 03/31/2011 09:27 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:16:58 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 03/31/2011 03:52 AM, bearophile wrote:
KennyTM~:
I think the GSoC group and language feature discussion group should
be separated.
Regarding D/Phobos feature discussions, they don't damage the summer
of code discussions significantly because they put in use almost a
different part of the brain.
They do share the same time budget.
So don't read/respond to the posts. I think any discouragement for open
discussion for any topic related to D is not a healthy attitude for an
open community.
Well you know it's considerably less simpler than that. Besides, I
probably wasn't clear enough: I'm not discouraging anything as much as
encouraging discussions that mark progress in important matters.
That's a better statement. I just don't think such "unimportant"
discussions are harmful or damaging, just don't participate if you don't
want to be distracted. We're all (mostly) adults in charge of our own
schedule. We don't need to be insulated from things.
Yeah, kinda, but the thing is that such discussions are often done
carrying the posture or tone that the language/compiler/library writers
should work or address that issue soon (or even in the medium-term).
That's perhaps what's most frustrating.
--
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
