On 03/31/2011 09:27 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:16:58 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 03/31/2011 03:52 AM, bearophile wrote:
KennyTM~:
I think the GSoC group and language feature discussion group should
be separated.
Regarding D/Phobos feature discussions, they don't damage the summer
of code discussions significantly because they put in use almost a
different part of the brain.
They do share the same time budget.
So don't read/respond to the posts. I think any discouragement for open
discussion for any topic related to D is not a healthy attitude for an
open community.
Well you know it's considerably less simpler than that. Besides, I
probably wasn't clear enough: I'm not discouraging anything as much as
encouraging discussions that mark progress in important matters.
If you want to have a GSOC-only discussion group, create a new newsgroup
or mailing list. Do not hijack this group.
This is not about GSoC (it's but one of several items I mentioned), it's
simply about making headway in topics that are important.
Andrei
