Daniel Gibson wrote: > Am 12.04.2011 12:45, schrieb Nick Sabalausky: >> Actually, because of that, I could likely be enticed by an (L)GPL-like >> license if it was actually readable like zlib, BSD, or MIT, and easier for >> users/developers to comply with. >> > > Even though the GPL isn't easy to read I think it's not too hard to > comply with (at least v2). Basically it's "release the source of your > changes, don't mix in source from incompatible licenses and don't delete the original authors from the GPL headers"
Not quite: you not only have to release the source of *your*
changes, but you also have to distribute the *whole* source (whether
you made any changes or not).
Jerome
--
mailto:jeber...@free.fr
http://jeberger.free.fr
Jabber: jeber...@jabber.fr
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
