Am 12.04.2011 20:11, schrieb "Jérôme M. Berger": > Daniel Gibson wrote: >> Am 12.04.2011 12:45, schrieb Nick Sabalausky: >>> Actually, because of that, I could likely be enticed by an (L)GPL-like >>> license if it was actually readable like zlib, BSD, or MIT, and easier for >>> users/developers to comply with. >>> >> >> Even though the GPL isn't easy to read I think it's not too hard to >> comply with (at least v2). Basically it's "release the source of your >> changes, don't mix in source from incompatible licenses and don't delete > the original authors from the GPL headers" > > Not quite: you not only have to release the source of *your* > changes, but you also have to distribute the *whole* source (whether > you made any changes or not). > > Jerome
If you don't change the source a link to the project homepage should suffice. And a link to the original source + your patch should be ok as well.
