On Mon, 23 May 2011 04:14:32 +0300, Robert Jacques <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2011 19:30:58 -0400, Vladimir Panteleev
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, 23 May 2011 02:15:49 +0300, Robert Jacques <[email protected]>
wrote:
As for performance, using appender is never slower than ~=, as it
uses essentially the same code.
I don't think using ~= when appending a string to a string will
validate the UTF. Will it?
For string ~= string, appender calls string[] = string, which does a
memcopy, iirc.
Right, so my complexity rant was BS, but appender will still validate UTF
on every append, unlike ~=. Isn't that a bug?
--
Best regards,
Vladimir mailto:[email protected]
