On Mon, 23 May 2011 00:48:07 -0400, Vladimir Panteleev
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, 23 May 2011 07:41:22 +0300, Robert Jacques <[email protected]>
wrote:
Well, all I can say is that it doesn't throw on my install. (Windows,
DMD 2.052) for either the patched nor un-patched appender
implementation. What version are you using?
2.053.
Ah. I think I've tracked down the problem. The term is(Range ==
Unqual!(T)[]) used to be true for a string and char[], and now it's
properly being evaluated to false, which in turn causes the wrong static
if branch to compile. So yes, this is a regression bug. You can fix by
replacing the conditional (at line 1594) with:
// note, we disable this branch for appending one type of char to
// another because we can't trust the length portion.
static if (is(typeof(_data.arr[0..1] = items[0..1])) &&
is(typeof(items.length) == size_t))
Or you can try out my patch to appender:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5813
