On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 09:00:13 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > I'd like to kindly request the author, the review manager, and the > community that TempAlloc skips this round of reviews without inclusion > in Phobos, to be reviewed again later.
As review manager, I don't mind postponing the review until some later time. As a community member and Phobos user, I think it would of course be preferable if TempAlloc fits into a more general allocator interface. As an active TempAlloc user, I hope it doesn't take too long before said interface is decided upon. ;) -Lars
