ok I should not use gmail for composing anymore. :) On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Thomas Mader <[email protected]>wrote:
> There is a small error on the index page. > > There are currently four implementations: > *"There are currently four implementations:"* > > but there are only *three* implementations listed. > > Thomas > >> There are currently four implementationsc >> > There are currently four implementations: > > There are currently four implementations: > > 1. Digital Mars dmd for > Windows<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-windows.html>, > x86 Linux <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-linux.html>, Mac OS > X<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-osx.html>, > and x86 FreeBSD <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-freebsd.html>. > 2. LLVM D Compiler ldc <http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc>. > 3. Gnu D compiler gdc <http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/wiki/Home>. > > There are currently four implementations: > > 1. Digital Mars dmd for > Windows<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-windows.html>, > x86 Linux <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-linux.html>, Mac OS > X<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-osx.html>, > and x86 FreeBSD <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-freebsd.html>. > 2. LLVM D Compiler ldc <http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc>. > 3. Gnu D compiler gdc <http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/wiki/Home>. > > There are currently four implementations: >> >> 1. Digital Mars dmd for >> Windows<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-windows.html>, >> x86 Linux <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-linux.html>, Mac OS >> X<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-osx.html>, >> and x86 FreeBSD <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-freebsd.html>. >> 2. LLVM D Compiler ldc <http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc>. >> 3. Gnu D compiler gdc <http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/wiki/Home>. >> >>
