On Jun 27, 11 19:32, Thomas Mader wrote:
ok I should not use gmail for composing anymore. :)
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Thomas Mader <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
There is a small error on the index page.
There are currently four implementations:
/"There are currently *four* implementations:"/
but there are only *three* implementations listed.
Thomas
There are currently four implementationsc
There are currently four implementations:
There are currently four implementations:
1. Digital Mars dmd for Windows
<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-windows.html>, x86 Linux
<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-linux.html>, Mac OS X
<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-osx.html>, and x86 FreeBSD
<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-freebsd.html>.
2. LLVM D Compiler ldc <http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc>.
3. Gnu D compiler gdc <http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/wiki/Home>.
There are currently four implementations:
1. Digital Mars dmd for Windows
<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-windows.html>, x86 Linux
<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-linux.html>, Mac OS X
<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-osx.html>, and x86 FreeBSD
<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-freebsd.html>.
2. LLVM D Compiler ldc <http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc>.
3. Gnu D compiler gdc <http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/wiki/Home>.
There are currently four implementations:
1. Digital Mars dmd for Windows
<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-windows.html>, x86
Linux <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-linux.html>, Mac
OS X <http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-osx.html>, and
x86 FreeBSD
<http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/dmd-freebsd.html>.
2. LLVM D Compiler ldc <http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc>.
3. Gnu D compiler gdc
<http://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/wiki/Home>.
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/index.html:
4. D.NET compiler alpha for .NET for D version 2.
<http://dnet.codeplex.com/>
However, this is no longer updated starting from 2009, so I don't think
this should be listed in d-p-l.org.
