On Friday 22 July 2011 01:19:40 Andrew Wiley wrote: > There was a lot of discussion about a few std.log proposals here a few > months back, and I was just wondering if someone had one they were planning > to put up for review in the near future. > I have a moderately sized codebase that needs a good logging module, and > rather than rolling one from scratch, I'd prefer to switch from the terrible > thing I'm using now to a not-so-stable API that someone wanted dogfooded > (dogfed?).
It's ready for reviewe, but its implementor went on vacation for a month or so. Presumably, it'll get reviewed not terribly long after he gets back. - Jonathan M Davis
