2011/7/22 Jacob Carlborg <[email protected]>: > Cool. But it's quite inconsistent that assignment requires "seq" and > declaration doesn't.
Yes it is inconsistent, but I think it is not big problem. Because assignment for reusing variables is not good way. It is not 'functional', need 'side-effect', so > (x, y) = seq!(1, 2); > > Would it be possible to allow the above syntax? it seems to me that supporting above syntax is not worth changing grammar cost. Kenji Hara
