On 2011-07-22 15:37, kenji hara wrote:
2011/7/22 Jacob Carlborg<[email protected]>:
Cool. But it's quite inconsistent that assignment requires "seq" and
declaration doesn't.
Yes it is inconsistent, but I think it is not big problem.
Because assignment for reusing variables is not good way.
It is not 'functional', need 'side-effect', so
(x, y) = seq!(1, 2);
Would it be possible to allow the above syntax?
it seems to me that supporting above syntax is not worth changing grammar cost.
Kenji Hara
Ok, I see.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
