On 01-09-2011 15:01, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 23:56:04 -0400, dsimcha wrote:
Since we have such an embarrassment of riches lately in terms of new
modules to be reviewed, we don't want bubbles in the review queue. The
first thing we need to decide is whether a review is allowed to run
concurrently with a vote. Andrei has suggested that reviews never run
concurrently with each other, and I agree. However, since the vote
stage takes up much less of the community's time, I think it's ok to run
a review and a vote concurrently with each other.
I don't see any reason why a review can't run concurrently with a vote.
I say we go ahead with reviewing the region allocator -- the GSoC
projects should have a high priority.
-Lars
+1 to this. I'd like to see std.log after std.regionallocator.
Completely unrelated question: What is the naming convention for Phobos
modules? If the name consists of two words does it become "twowords" or
"two_words"? I'm just asking because you mentioned parallel_algorithm
which got me a bit confused.
- Alex
