== Quote from Timon Gehr ([email protected])'s article > Allocating a class or struct instance with a given allocator seems not > to be part of the standard allocator interface. Why is that?
Pure oversight. This should probably be fixed. > (their implementations would be almost identical between most > allocators, but the same could be said about the newArray etc. member > functions) newArray, etc. weren't in Andrei's initial proposal. I added them because an allocator might want to do something "special" given type info.
