Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote: > I'd say we all lighten up a little. Tiobe is not unequivocally > meaningless and D registered a good jump lately, which I believe is > rooted in reality. I was glad about that and posted it on reddit. Tiobe > is open about its methods and people can draw their conclusions.
That is what I'm interested in about it. Tiobe's methods may not be best to decide which language is used, should be used, or is interesting, but it is consistent. D moved into the top 20 (10 positions) in a year. And I'm pretty sure those that have been following D, that in the last year, there has been an increased interest/activity in the language. So while Tiobe may not be accurate, it is showing what most here probably already feel.
