On Sep 26, 2011, at 12:54 AM, Andrew Wiley wrote: > > Actually, I keep trying to come up with a code sample for this, and > I'm not managing to find anything that works and makes any sense > because the shared keyword propagates to the members, so I have to > lock the rwmutex to lock one of its submutexes, and I'm not getting > that to work with the type system at all. Could someone who's done > more with shared/synchronized post a code sample of what this should > look like?
shared hasn't yet been applied to the classes in core.sync, so what you're seeing is expected. I should really fix this however. It just has a tricky cascade effect on declarations within core.sys.posix.
