On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Sean Kelly <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sep 26, 2011, at 12:54 AM, Andrew Wiley wrote: >> >> Actually, I keep trying to come up with a code sample for this, and >> I'm not managing to find anything that works and makes any sense >> because the shared keyword propagates to the members, so I have to >> lock the rwmutex to lock one of its submutexes, and I'm not getting >> that to work with the type system at all. Could someone who's done >> more with shared/synchronized post a code sample of what this should >> look like? > > shared hasn't yet been applied to the classes in core.sync, so what you're > seeing is expected. I should really fix this however. It just has a tricky > cascade effect on declarations within core.sys.posix.
Does that include core.sync.condition?
