At the time, there were some errors in the headers and I wasn't up to tracking them down. It was also unclear whether the headers were copyrighted, though I've since found that docs surrounding the Boost license that headers aren't copyrightable. Finally, no one has complained about lack of windows header coverage. The headers you mention are enormous, which means more program bloat and more maintenance work. I wouldn't replace what we've got unless people really want the other ones.
Sent from my iPhone On Oct 15, 2011, at 9:00 AM, Gor Gyolchanyan <gor.f.gyolchan...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've found a wonderful Win32 API binding on dsource, which is far more > complete, then the one in Phobos: > http://svn.dsource.org/projects/bindings/trunk/win32/ > Why not replace the Phobos one with this one?
