Andrej Mitrovic wrote: >On 12/3/11, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com> wrote: >> If you have a considerably better proposal for std.signals > >Johannes Pfau made an updated one, not me. And I'd rather use it for a >while and hack in new features when necessary and debug it properly >than shove it into phobos and make it another DOA module that nobody >uses.
It's not really ready for phobos. Probably better than the current std.signals, but still not ready. The API seems to be ok, but can be extended with some ideas from boost.signals2 and the implementation should be replaced with boost.signals2 code as well. When I find some time I might clean it up and propose it for phobos, but don't hold your breath. -- Johannes Pfau
