Am 24.01.2012, 03:43 Uhr, schrieb Nick Sabalausky <[email protected]>:
"Tobias Pankrath" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Am I the only one who thinks this sounds like a horrible idea? :)
It's horrible, but not as horrible as using straight JavaScript (or
CoffeeScript, IMO).
It's a necessary evil thanks to JavaScript's underserved ubiquity.
Google Web Toolkit works quite well.
I'd have a hard time trusting it. Would the resulting code necessarily
use
Ajax even if I didn't want it to? How much JS overhead does it pull in
for
simple uses of JS? Does the resulting code automatically interact with
Google's servers in any way? How compatible is the resulting JS? Would
the
resulting code break the page when JS is off? It's Google, for god's
sake,
can they even be trusted at all? Etc.
Trust is not enough, you must love the big brother.</brainwash>
