"Tobias Pankrath" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > >> What's your point? Any one of them answered the wrong way would render it >> unusuable for my use-cases. Technical or not, that certainly makes them >> relevent. > > My point was, that compiling a language like D/Java to Javascript for > web programming is an approach, that can work well. > > Your arguments are all matters of trust (or the lack of) in an > implementation and its implementor. Thus they don't apply in the > general case. >
Oh right. I wasn't talking about the general case at all, just that particular one. I absolutely agree that compiling a language down to JS is a valid approach. (It's no substitute for bypassing JS altogether of course, but that unfortunately isn't a realistic option for web developers at the moment.)
