On Friday, January 27, 2012 20:46:17 Kagamin wrote: > On Monday, 23 January 2012 at 00:24:39 UTC, Jonathan M Davis > > wrote: > > So, I really think that we should say that we don't support > > pre-Win2K, and I'd like to say that we don't support pre-XP, > > but I don't think that it hurts us any to say that we support > > Win2K. > > An example of system requirements for a .net application: > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/goglobal/bb964665
So, Win2K+, which is probably what we'll be doing. It should be noted, however, that that's a .NET 2.0 application, and they're up to at least 4 now, so I don't know how that affects things. In general though, as I understand it, there's very few API calls which are XP-specific. Win2K and Vista are where the biggest changes are. So, if you're supporting XP, you probably might as well support Win2K. - Jonathan M Davis
