On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 17:11:14 +0100, Alex Rønne Petersen
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 01-03-2012 08:26, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-03-01 01:53, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
package functions are currenly non-virtual.
The spec claims that "all non-static non-private non-template
member func
tions are virtual," which would mean that package is supposed to be
virtual.
But from what I recall, the plan is to leave package as non-virtual.
So, is
that indeed the case and the spec needs to be fixed, or is package
going to be
made virtual at some point?
- Jonathan M Davis
Is anyone even using "package"? I've basically never used it.
I use it. It's useful when you wish to create higher-level wrappers
around stuff. (Interestingly, I only ever use package for constructors.)
Because 'package' doesn't work for anything but functions?
