On 2012-03-11 20:55, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Mobile sites have traditionally required less-fancy implementations, so it's not unreasonable to think that some sites would use their mobile version *as* their low-tech fallback version. That's becoming less and less true these days, of course. But looking at http://m.drdobbs.com/ I have a strong feeling that was originally created for things like AvantGo (ie, on PalmOS) which really were very limited: no JS, no nested tables, very low resolution, often not even any color, very low memory, etc. Not that anything about what they're doing really makes a whole lot of sense anyway, though.
Actually, on some sites I use the mobile version, on the desktop. Just because it's so much more clean and not as verbose.
-- /Jacob Carlborg
