On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:41:53 -0500, Nick Sabalausky <[email protected]> wrote:
You know what I think it is (without actually looking at the code): I
think
they tried to do some highly misguided and even more poorly implemented
hack
(which they no-doubt thought was clever) for dealing with *cough* "old"
*cough* browsers by inserting a meta redirect to a hardcoded URL, and
then
used JS to disable the meta redirect. If that's the case, I don't know
how
the fuck they managed to convince themselves that make one drop of sense.
It could be that they don't care to cater to people who hate JS. There
aren't that many of you.
You may want to consider -- if you on principle don't view pages with
information because the pages contain JS, you are the one missing out on
the information.
If you worked for my company, and you didn't like JS, you'd have a tough
(actually impossible) time using the web application we have for tracking
things.
-Steve
