"H. S. Teoh" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > Is this a bug? > > import std.stdio; > void main() { > immutable(int)[4] a; > immutable(int[4]) b; > writeln(typeid(a)); > writeln(typeid(b)); > } > > Output: > > immutable(int[4]) > immutable(int[4]) > > So there's no tail-const type for static arrays? > > More to the point, how should AA's with immutable static array keys be > implemented? The current implementation doesn't work at all because the > input static array can't be assigned to the Slot (the static array field > in Slot is completely immutable, even from the Slot ctor???). > > > T > > -- > It is widely believed that reinventing the wheel is a waste of time; but > I disagree: without wheel reinventers, we would be still be stuck with > wooden horse-cart wheels.
This is correct. It's the same as for primitive types. Because they implicitly convert to immutable, AAs should store a mutable copy. T[N] should be handled almost the same as T.
