On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 03:51:01PM +1100, Daniel Murphy wrote: > "H. S. Teoh" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected]... > > > > Argh. So I have to hack around this by casting an immutable static > > array key into a mutable one inside the AA? (Which should work, I > > suppose, because a copy is being made.) Or should I just leave this > > alone for now and wait for dmd to be fixed? > > > > > > I think the bug only applies to the constructor. > > Up to you. If you use a workaround, try and put a static assert in that > will fail when the bug's fixed. [...]
Cool, that's an excellent way to remind oneself to change the code after the bug is fixed! :-) T -- Many open minds should be closed for repairs. -- K5 user
