On 14 April 2012 00:30, Walter Bright <newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote:
> On 4/13/2012 6:07 AM, Manu wrote: > >> Awesome, I missed that. Although it sucks it's deprecated, what's the >> intended >> alternative? >> >> Now if I could only have more of those for malloc/free, and >> fopen/close/read/write/seek etc. >> > > For a static library, you can hijack anything simply by providing your own > implementation of it. The linker will prefer your version. > The druntime versions are marked weak? And that also works with GDC? I'll give that a shot, cheers!
