On 4/14/2012 3:51 AM, Manu wrote:
On 14 April 2012 00:30, Walter Bright <newshou...@digitalmars.com
<mailto:newshou...@digitalmars.com>> wrote:
On 4/13/2012 6:07 AM, Manu wrote:
Awesome, I missed that. Although it sucks it's deprecated, what's the
intended
alternative?
Now if I could only have more of those for malloc/free, and
fopen/close/read/write/seek etc.
For a static library, you can hijack anything simply by providing your own
implementation of it. The linker will prefer your version.
The druntime versions are marked weak?
No.
Remember, the linker only looks in the library to find UNRESOLVED symbols. If
it's resolved, it won't look for it in the library.
