On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 18:06 +0200, Timon Gehr wrote:
[...]
> The issue is that the meaning of (S) {} in non-template delegate
> signatures has changed: Previously it was a delegate with an unnamed
> parameter of type 'S', now it is a delegate with a parameter named 'S'
> of a deduced type. I think that the second meaning is more useful and
> more consistent, but YMMV. (You can name the parameter '_' or something
> along those lines to express that it is not used.)OK, so I missed the memo, my fault. Is _ just a valid name that can be used in a conventional way, or is it an unallocated variable? -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
