On 04/19/2012 06:23 PM, Russel Winder wrote:
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 18:06 +0200, Timon Gehr wrote: [...]The issue is that the meaning of (S) {} in non-template delegate signatures has changed: Previously it was a delegate with an unnamed parameter of type 'S', now it is a delegate with a parameter named 'S' of a deduced type. I think that the second meaning is more useful and more consistent, but YMMV. (You can name the parameter '_' or something along those lines to express that it is not used.)OK, so I missed the memo, my fault. Is _ just a valid name that can be used in a conventional way, or is it an unallocated variable?
It is a valid identifier.
