On 23-04-2012 11:38, CTFE-4-the-win wrote:
On Monday, 23 April 2012 at 08:08:52 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 04/23/2012 01:56 AM, deadalnix wrote:
Le 21/04/2012 18:54, bearophile a écrit :
Jonathan M Davis:
There have been discussions about the comma operator before. I don't
expect that it's going anywhere,
Maybe there are intermediate solutions between keeping wild commas in D
and disallowing them fully. I think most of my bugs caused by commas
are
similar to the one shown by the OP. This means this is not a common
source of bugs:
foo(), bar();
This is completely redundant with foo(); bar();
Not completely, you also need { }
if(qux()) foo(), bar();
I see no benefit from being able to do this.
I think the most common use-case for the , operator is in the "increment
part" of for loops... but this could of course be special-cased to still
be allowed...
Which is what the rest of the world's programming languages (other than
C and C++) do.
--
- Alex
