On 04/24/2012 03:21 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
if(r.front == 'a' && (r.popFront(), r.front) == 'b') { ... }
There are a few similar usages in Phobos. If comma was to be used as a
tuple constructor instead, those could be replaced by ( , )[$-1].
Tuples with void elements?
Yes. They behave similar to void.
And if the first exp had a value one wouldn't like to pay for the copying.
How would this require copying? D language tuples already work in a way
that would make (,)[$-1] completely equivalent to what (,) does now.
