On Wed, 09 May 2012 15:34:30 -0700, Joseph Rushton Wakeling
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/05/12 00:25, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Which is what fueled the market for hundreds (if not thousands) of JS
obfuscators.
Well, that's kind of my point really. Is it so bad (from a proprietary
point of view) to have to distribute .d rather than .di files, if you
can obfuscate them?
In a word yes. Obsfucation hides details, but it can't hide algorithms
very well. It can just make them harder to follow. Hence why most
companies don't put anything of value into JS.
--
Adam Wilson
IRC: LightBender
Project Coordinator
The Horizon Project
http://www.thehorizonproject.org/
