Am 10.05.2012 00:34, schrieb Joseph Rushton Wakeling:
On 10/05/12 00:25, H. S. Teoh wrote:Which is what fueled the market for hundreds (if not thousands) of JS obfuscators.Well, that's kind of my point really. Is it so bad (from a proprietary point of view) to have to distribute .d rather than .di files, if you can obfuscate them?
Try to find an error on an obfuscated dump. Not fun. -- Paulo
