On Thursday, 31 May 2012 at 10:58:51 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2012 03:25:40 -0400, Mehrdad
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Friday, 11 May 2012 at 15:23:10 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
I'll wait for an answer before thinking more about this. It
feels imminently solvable...
-Steve
Did you come across any ideas? :)
Sorry lost track of this. I'll think about it again.
-Steve
o lol. ok.
Do you think it'd be difficult to add an extra layer of
indirection for calling the current "constructors"/finalizers? I
feel like, if DMD would just look for a __construct and a
__destroy static method instead of directly calling the
constructor/finalizer, it'd all work out nicely...
