On 6/1/2012 5:29 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
No. What we need is a non-throwing version of malloc that returns NULL.
We have it. It's called "malloc"! :-)
On 6/1/2012 5:29 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
No. What we need is a non-throwing version of malloc that returns NULL.
We have it. It's called "malloc"! :-)