On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:50:16 -0400, Walter Bright <[email protected]> wrote:

On 6/1/2012 5:29 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
No. What we need is a non-throwing version of malloc that returns NULL.

We have it. It's called "malloc"!

Oh sorry, I meant *GC.malloc* :)

-Steve

Reply via email to