On 6/1/2012 5:29 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:No. What we need is a non-throwing version of malloc that returns NULL.We have it. It's called "malloc"!
Oh sorry, I meant *GC.malloc* :) -Steve
On 6/1/2012 5:29 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:No. What we need is a non-throwing version of malloc that returns NULL.We have it. It's called "malloc"!
Oh sorry, I meant *GC.malloc* :) -Steve