Not that it would actually /do/ something for you at runtime...
Funny, I always imagined 'shared' was just a type constructor
like 'const'... meant to help you check the correctness of your
code.
- should pure functions accept/deal with shared data? Steven Schveighoffer
- Re: should pure functions accept/deal with share... Alex Rønne Petersen
- Re: should pure functions accept/deal with s... Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: should pure functions accept/deal wi... Alex Rønne Petersen
- Re: should pure functions accept/dea... Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: should pure functions accep... Alex Rønne Petersen
- Re: should pure functions accept/deal with s... Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: should pure functions accept/deal wi... Alex Rønne Petersen
- Re: should pure functions accept/dea... Mehrdad
- Re: should pure functions accept/dea... Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: should pure functions accep... Alex Rønne Petersen
- Re: should pure functions accep... Manu
- Re: should pure functions accep... Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: should pure functions accept/deal with s... Steven Schveighoffer
- Re: should pure functions accept/deal wi... Artur Skawina
- Re: should pure functions accept/deal wi... Steven Schveighoffer
- Re: should pure functions accept/dea... Artur Skawina
- Re: should pure functions accept/dea... Steven Schveighoffer
- Re: should pure functions accep... Artur Skawina
