Re: should pure functions accept/deal with shared data?

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 6/7/12 9:13 AM, Manu wrote:

On 7 June 2012 04:55, Andrei Alexandrescu <seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org
<mailto:seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org>> wrote:

    We could define shared to refuse compilation on odd machines, and
    THEN provide an atomic template with the expected performance of a lock.


*sigh* .. my biggest pet peeve with the D community.
ARM and PPC are not 'odd'

I agree. I didn't mean to qualify ARM/PPC as odd.

Andrei