On 7/12/2012 12:59 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
So, I think that it's probably a solid way to go, and it does appear to solve the const issues that we've been having quite nicely, but it also appears to break a number of things which have worked for some time, and we're going to have to figure out how we're going to deal with that, even if it's only providing a good deprecation path.
A main motivation for going this route is to avoid breaking existing code.
